MAG Launch Trailer

Well, it doesn't really matter but then again, MW2 is on PS3 too so I am surprised he is upset at that game whether there are glitchers or not.

I'm NOT a fanboy, fanboys are really nerdy freaking guys with no life.
Besides, most of my friends HATE MW2 now.

I love many games, i just hate the ones people ruin from glitching and hacking.

Wow, you and your friends then seem to hate some of the best games out there then. I don't personally play all of those good games mentioned in the past but I don know what is popular.

It really isn't a BAD game if you get on a server where there isn't a glitcher or camper around every corner.
MW2 is just really unrealistic too.
I like good graphic games, with real details, and made from people who are wussies who are afraid to show gore and blood in games -cough-infinityward-cough-

I haven't played it but people are saying Bad Company 2 I think is better than that as they played he demos.

Bad company 2 is much better than the first.

I was joking when I said you were a fanboy. What makes MW2 unrealistic? I haven't played it myself but have heard a lot of good things about it.

I will say this, I haven't heard one negative remark on the game except from you Popy. That is all I do know.

Really?
The internet is aflame with rants on MW2.

Well, the unrealistic thing is the guns.
Like their all not to real life specifications, such as the stopping power of the guns.
Here is some quotes of rants on the game;

"1.) Double shotty? I've fired a shotgun before. Anyone need both wrists broken or a a barrel imprint on your forehead? 'nough said.

2.) I liked the idea of having Overkill as a perk to be able to use 2 primary weapons. Why would any fool use a pistol anymore?

3.) Having almost every attachment on almost every weapon seems a bit strange to me.

Ok, I know I'm just coming back online and just starting MW2. I am a bit of a purest (or purist?) when it comes to realism. I do know that it's only a game. Next thing you know we'll have low-gravity maps....at that point why not play HALO?"

And this one contains some spoilers;




cod4 has an epic, fun, engaging story, **bleep** was iw thinking with straying away from that? i woulda been fine with the same style and themes and cod4 for mw2! all ghillied up, war pig, etc.. sigh i expected the same in this game, well anyways... i have some rants and questions

im so mad at mw2

who the heck is shepherd!? and why the bleep is soap and price enemies to the world?? and why did price blow up the international space station exactly!? if the usa is under attack and at war at its homeland, tell me why again in space theres an american-speaking nasa-like mission in space, uh expecting any new takeoff flights planned for the day? really, did he just ask that? and why was i killing american "soldiers" in afghanistan for the last level, who are they affiliated with anyway, if they killed ghost?? **bleep** was going on!?!?! and where the heck did makarov go!? where the heck are the allies of the usa during the "takeover"??



so far i think the iss was used a control for usa defense systems and russians hacked it and allowed them to invade usa, i get that much. everything else, no.

sheperd is a colonel in the army. soap and price are enemies because sheperd agreed to a bribe from makarov. price didn't mean to blow up the space station, he was trying to stop the war by randomly firing the nuke into space. you were killing soldiers because they were sheperds men. not sure where makarov went but im sure that will be answered in MW3. (they have to make a new one, you can't end a game like that.)

i said that they were rants from the INTERNET not me.

Uh, I just got confused. ??