# Facebook math

Shining Epiphany :: Community :: Other

## Facebook math

https://brilliant.org/community-problem/a-problem-by-arul-kolla/?group=i2KL1625hqMK

(What is 2^2014 - 2^2013?)

I didn't want to comment on the facebook link, so I'll write crap here.

This is a series of characters and formatting, presumably to represent a mathematical expression using arabic numerals of base ten. To expand on that: This expression presumably uses elements of the ring integers (We'll call this set Z) under standard addition and multiplication (We'll call this ring ZR). The term - is presumably shorthand for the function -:ZR->ZR with a-b = a + b * -1 given a,b in ZR. The ^ operator (superscript in the link) is not a ring operator, but, assuming it is standard exponentiation, it is trivial to show ^ is closed for the left operand an integer, and the right operand a positive integer, and therefore should cause no problems with evaluation of the expression. I will also assume we are following the standard notation, which requires operations of ^ to occur before operations of - or + or *. In that case, it is fairly simple to evaluate the expression, assuming it is to be evaluated alone. 2^2014 - 2^2013 can be rewritten as 2*2^2013 - 2^2013 or (2-1)2^2013 using the distributive property of rings. We are also using the ( ) as a notation for precedence of evaluation, so (2-1)*2^2013 = 1*2^2013. We know 1 is the multiplicative identity of the ZR ring, therefore 2^2014 - 2^2013 = 2^2013.

/\

\/

Math class withdrawal sucks

(What is 2^2014 - 2^2013?)

I didn't want to comment on the facebook link, so I'll write crap here.

This is a series of characters and formatting, presumably to represent a mathematical expression using arabic numerals of base ten. To expand on that: This expression presumably uses elements of the ring integers (We'll call this set Z) under standard addition and multiplication (We'll call this ring ZR). The term - is presumably shorthand for the function -:ZR->ZR with a-b = a + b * -1 given a,b in ZR. The ^ operator (superscript in the link) is not a ring operator, but, assuming it is standard exponentiation, it is trivial to show ^ is closed for the left operand an integer, and the right operand a positive integer, and therefore should cause no problems with evaluation of the expression. I will also assume we are following the standard notation, which requires operations of ^ to occur before operations of - or + or *. In that case, it is fairly simple to evaluate the expression, assuming it is to be evaluated alone. 2^2014 - 2^2013 can be rewritten as 2*2^2013 - 2^2013 or (2-1)2^2013 using the distributive property of rings. We are also using the ( ) as a notation for precedence of evaluation, so (2-1)*2^2013 = 1*2^2013. We know 1 is the multiplicative identity of the ZR ring, therefore 2^2014 - 2^2013 = 2^2013.

/\

\/

Math class withdrawal sucks

**Mustaf Herod Apyur Poupr**- Corporal
- Posts : 42

Points : 1749

Join date : 2013-10-02

Location : Your mom! Lawl

## Re: Facebook math

I tried to submit the answer on that website but it said I had to register in order to do so. As if I'm going to give them my personal information so I can do math problems. As if my college classes don't give me enough math problems to do...

_________________

Games I'm playing this month: Minecraft, Starcraft 2, Garry's Mod, League of Legends.

Two paths diverged in a wood. And I? I took the one less traveled by... and that has made all the difference.

**Eagle Eye307**- SE Administrator
- Posts : 9861

Points : 13501

Join date : 2008-08-20

Age : 25

Location : Boston

Xbox Account

Xbox Live: Yes

Gamertag: Parrot Wing

Clan Tag: V01

Shining Epiphany :: Community :: Other

Page

**1**of**1****Permissions in this forum:**

**cannot**reply to topics in this forum